Why Einstein Was a Genius?

Yesterday, I was watching a program named “Ancient Aliens” on History channel. This program was an inquiry into the reason of intelligence of history’s great minds like Albert Einstein, Socrates, Ramanuja and others. The major focus of program was about Einstein’s brain. They stated that Einstein was in touch with some ancient aliens. He used to connect them with a special method of thought experiment. Aliens gave him the understanding of universe. All the theories of Einstein were not discovered by him but given by some outside power or authority. Same was stated about Socrates, Ramanuja and others great ones.

I don’t know what their motive to show this program was. Whether they were trying to prove the existence of ancient aliens or explaining that Einstein was not a genius. Einstein discovered very important theories in a very short period of time; and those theories changed the whole pattern of thinking about universe. This was unbelievable and people still have many doubts about it.

So, how should we look into this matter?

Thinking about Aliens or God is a result of petty mind. When we don’t understand something; we try to find excuses to avoid it. When we see something that is not within the limits of understanding; we give it names of Ghosts, God or Aliens etc. This way we are just avoiding the facts.

Einstein’s brain became a subject of research after his death. After doing a lot of research scientists came to know that his brain was not like the brain of other people. There were so many physical differences in the brain structure. One of the differences was the inferior parietal lobe of brain. It was 15 percent wider than normal. The inferior parietal region is responsible for mathematical thought, visuospatial cognition, and imagery of movement. Due to this difference, Einstein was able to imagine or visualize more accurately, more deeply and much more real.

Our mind works on symbols, codes and words. The process of recording and retrieving information is based on symbols. All the thoughts, ideas, experiences and memories are made of words, symbols and codes. As we know that generally we cannot think without words. Just try to think without words now and you will realize the problem in doing so. Whatever we think is a form put together by words whether they have distinct meanings or not. If we want to imagine a tree we have to use the word “Tree” in our thoughts. If we want to imagine a person we have to use his name as a command to retrieve his picture from mind. We have labels for everything. We have labels even for feelings and sensation. So words or symbols are used to store and retrieve data into memory.

Mathematics is a common language of universe. It is totally based on symbols and every symbol of Mathematics can contain a hundred times more data than any other ordinary word. Any equation or formula created by putting together a few mathematical symbols can contain more information than about a 1000 pages book. So Mathematics provides us so much power to think about large and extraordinary things in just a few seconds; one can handle large information with the help of tiny symbols. As we can see the power of E=mc2 which is a theory of mass–energy equivalence discovered by Einstein in 1905. This simple 4 letters formula contains mysteries of whole universe. So Mathematics works like a very powerful language system. Due to the large parietal lobe, Einstein’s brain was more powerful than any other person in dealing with Mathematical symbols so it was so much efficient in storing and retrieving large bundles of data very quickly with the help of Mathematics. And you will wonder to know that Mathematics is the purest logic and base of all other disciplines. So all this was working like a superpower for Einstein.

The other thing is, words and reality are two different things. When we record a reality in words, we use special kinds of symbols. But the reality and symbols are not the same. I can write about mountains, rivers, trees and clouds on a simple white paper with the help of few words. But the words are not mountains, rivers and clouds. They are just symbols made of ink on a paper. So the information stored in symbols or words is totally different than the reality. Sometimes we find things which cannot be explained in words. When the mind thinks about mountains it uses words to do so. Thinking about mountain is totally different thing than a mountain. So there is always a gap between the thought and reality. This gap is so much wide and can never be filled by any thought experiment. And this creates a limit for thinking. Our mind has a limit that it can never think about the things which are not stored in its memory; and the memory is a bundle made of words and symbols. Due to Einstein’s large parietal lobe, he was able to fill this gap. He was able to imagine and visualize the things as they are. His mind was not dependent on just symbols and words but able to touch the real in its true sense. He was able to think about things without labels. When you see a tree and give it a label “Tree”, you miss the actual and go into the words with all its limitations and illusions.  Einstein’s brain was different and this was an extraordinary quality. This is the quality that brings about understanding. The understanding which is not about knowledge, but a direct and silent observation of reality. This is the quality that is called enlightenment; looking the things as they are without any mediator like words, symbols or memory etc.

These are my personal thoughts, and not conclusions. As we know that no knowledge is certain. Think about these things yourself and share your words in comments with me.

Thank you.

20 thoughts on “Why Einstein Was a Genius?

  1. this is very nice artical …
    but how it is possible to think about that particular object …..which we don’t know…
    is it related with any sense….
    i mean like 6th sense movie….??

    1. Your question is really good my brother. Thinking means the response of mind for something… from its memory… and memory is always old. So the mind can never think anything outside its memory. It is true.

      In this post, I am thinking about a different kind of response of mind. What will happen if the mind does not respond “from its memory”.

      If we wan to understand something “NEW” we have to leave the old pattern of thinking.

      When a new challenge appears, you can handle it with all your past knowledge. The knowledge, which is a collection of all the experiences, accumulated words from different books, recorded memories, created conclusions based on self cantered approach towards life and all the rest of it.

      If you will approach in this way, you will find out nothing or whatever you find will be old or the continuity of past. In this way you are not doing anything new, you are just repeating the old memory. Your all approach is based on the dead past.

      How can you find or understand which is totally new with the help of the past? The mind with all its memory is so much limited, and all deduced conclusions based on this limited memory will lead you to nothing. This is like a paradox. It is just like making a few explanations and thinking that you have solved the whole crises.

      When the mind knows it completely… mind will not react from the past for a new challenge. Because in that condition the mind knows the absurdity of reaction. In that very moment something extraordinary takes place. When the mind is silently observing something, when the mind is not interfering with that particular object with its thoughts, when the mind does not put a label on that thing, when the mind does not respond from its past memory… something new will take place. And that will be the moment of discovery and understanding.

      Einstein was able to observe the things ( daily things that are all around us ) in a different way. But his response of mind was not based on old memory. He was aware that with the same old thinking new can not be understood.

      It was possible due to his visualization and imagination powers. He was not using words for thinking but at looking the things ( daily things ) without a response of memory.

      Next time when you see a “Tree” don’t put a label on it. Don’t response from the old memory about the green colors of leaves, hardness of it, smell of it and all the rest information stored in memory. But look at it completely without interfering… as it is. This perfect looking…. without any verbal explanation… or response of memory….. will connect you directly with that tree. You will feel that you are looking that thing “first time”. Because you are not digging you mind to remember all other trees you have seen in your life. It will become a new experience.

      This is called looking at old things… with a totally new approach. Free from all the past memory. And it gives the observer freedom to look into new. It happens when we don’t use verbal knowledge of our mind, when we don’t respond from the stored knowledge of our mind. When we are not using the words or symbols. Mind is free from everything; empty, receptive and sensitive.

      This is the moment when there are millions of possibilities and Einstein was doing the same. His approach to ordinary things was new which gave him a new vision and understanding.

      This is so much difficult to explain but I have tried my good.

      1. Nice sir.. what a deep observation. really very nice article…

        you said “Thinking means the response of mind for something… from its memory… and memory is always old. So the mind can never think anything outside its memory.” yes its true… When mind store anything in its memory i.e in 2D or 3D photographic form,or in video form or experiences what whatever it may, it provide some reference to that which is nothing we called it as a “WORD OR SYMBOL OR CODES” (as written in your previous articles) so as to ease mind to retrieve it whenever it needs.so it has become habit of mind and it is so automatic.

        Every new thing we accumulate into memory with some reference that are “WORDS or SYMBOLS OR CODES”, but if we think more deeply
        “WORDS or SYMBOLS OR CODES” are also something which needs to accumulate somewhere into memory, so my First question is what minds uses to refer this “WORDS or SYMBOLS OR CODES”? How does mind store it??

        To work on something, first we need to understand it Totally. for example in case of tress,Water and Bio-fertilizer are
        essential. But you said ” in case of “Tree” don’t put a label on it. Don’t response from the old memory about the green colors of leaves, hardness of it, smell of it and all the rest information stored in memory.”

        I had tried this but, whenever am looking at tree,automatically my mind puts “Trees,leafs,branches… etc” (WORD OR SYMBOL) in
        front of me,this happens so automatic and so fast,that i found which are not in my Conscious control.

        As you wrote in your earlier article,when i want to recall any experience or object first its reference WORD OR SYMBOL comes to my mind and then the object , and when i see any object, my mind will analyze and put forward the correct reference WORD OR SYMBOL in my mind. so here “WORD OR SYMBOL” forms a relation between ME and ACTUAL OBJECT or IMAGINARY THINGS PROJECTED BY MY MIND. so can we say this “WORD OR SYMBOL” are interference in between ME and REALITY … so is it possible to drop this interference??
        If i tried so hard to do it, if i don’t give any label to it…. how can mind will accumulate it?? So if it can’t accumulate , can we do anything on it?? can we provide Water and Bio-Fertilizer now . how we will know Nature,how can we understand or discover what “tree” actually is??

        So What “UNDERSTANDING” actually mean to the MIND??

        1. Hello Shekhar,

          Your question is really interesting. What mind uses to refer the words, symbols and codes? How does mind store it?

          I don’t know the answer of this question. When I was learning language in school, I had a beautiful book, full of pictures and colors. On first page, there was a picture and it was written “Apple” under that. Since that day, my mind uses this label “Apple” to that particular fruit. When I see that fruit or want to remember that fruit, I use this label.

          But before that, there was no label in my mind for that particular fruit. There was no mediator between me and that. But in the process of learning a language, my mind was conditioned by thousands of labels. Language is to deal with information and knowledge. It is a different world of “Words”.
          I will think about it more deeply to understand it. I request you share your views on this question.

          Your second question is about the response of mind.

          One must understand the conditioning of mind. Tree is a tree forever. It does not depend on our observation. Whether we put a label on it or not… it will be the same. And yes it is a barrier between one and reality. One must be in direct touch with the object to understand it completely. Words are conditioned and influenced and they cannot give us the freedom we need to observe.

          This barrier can be drop very easily. It the mind can understand that the word is just a symbol and it has no relation with the object. If the mind can understand that the word has no meaning in itself. It will automatically drop the word. It cannot be done forcefully. One cannot practice this thing… and even one should not. It is totally based on understanding. Don’t force yourself to do so. If you really want to know the difference, than try to understand the relation between “words” and “objects”.

          Reaction of mind is an experience accumulated by mind itself. Does it mean that mind is making its own experience and connecting them to symbols and words? When we see a new color, we ask “Which color is this?” and we store a label for that color. This reaction of mind to the new is an experience and mind wants to be with it. I really don’t understand this complication.

          There are so many books where one can find the answer for these questions. But all those questions are futile without the understanding. The more I go into this matter, the more I get confused. But it is really interesting.

          Keep in touch. I will share about it, when it will come to me.

          Thank you.

  2. Your article is very interesting.
    Thank you. _/_
    I wonder what is the part of the brain in the enlightenment experience. I am very interested in the aspect of “without words” observation, when the observation is free from verbal, cultural, knowledge. It’s interesting to imagine what may be such a case. What do we see? What do we feel? What new experience leads us to see the “real.” A question arises: “What is real?” Then we would enter into an energy experience where living would no longer appear in a form but just as particle? The potential energy of the universe would it be contained in a single particle? And this observation would grasp its meaning. In this case, what is the part of us that watched? the brain, or something else. Or maybe a level of understanding and use of the brain not yet experienced. Unknown dimensions.
    Thank you my friend 🙂

    1. Hello Maryline

      How can we say something is “Real”? To say this, we must have a pre assumption about the meaning of “Real”. And that is not possible. So it becomes so much complicated to understand this all.

      Like I have picture of someone. I will go from one city to another to find him with that picture. I will compare everyone’s face to that picture to know, is it the one to whom I am searching or not.

      But how can I find someone if I don’t have his picture. Ho will I recognize him after meeting without a pre defined assumption. It is not possible.

      As far as we are concerned about non-verbal observation, it is clarity to the mind. A state of mind when it is silent, still, sensitive, alert and have no confusion. When it is in a direct connection with real.

      Don’t confuse about the real and ultimate reality. I use the word real for looking something as it is. Looking something without giving a color to it.

      You know it much better than me. Isn’t it?

  3. Nice sir.. what a deep observation. really very nice article…

    you said “Thinking means the response of mind for something… from its memory… and memory is always old. So the mind can never think anything outside its memory.” yes its true…
    When mind store anything in its memory i.e in 2D or 3D photographic form,or in video form or experiences what whatever it may, it provide some reference to that which is nothing we called it as a “WORD OR SYMBOL OR CODES” (as written in your previous articles) so as to ease mind to retrieve it whenever it needs. It has become habit of mind and it is automatic.

    Every new thing we accumulate into memory with some reference that are “WORDS or SYMBOLS OR CODES”, but if we think more deeply “WORDS or SYMBOLS OR CODES” are also something which needs to accumulate somewhere into memory, so my First question is what minds uses to refer this “WORDS or SYMBOLS OR CODES”? How does mind store it??

    To work on something, first we need to understand it Totally. for example in case of tress,Water and Bio-fertilizer are essential. But you said ” in case of “Tree” don’t put a label on it. Don’t response from the old memory about the green colors of leaves, hardness of it, smell of it and all the rest information stored in memory.”

    I had tried this but, whenever am looking at a tree,automatically my mind puts “Trees,leafs,branches etc” (WORD OR SYMBOL) in front of me,this happens so automatic and so fast,that i found which are not in my Conscious control. as you wrote in your earlier article,when i want to recall any experience or object first its reference WORD OR SYMBOL comes to my mind and then the object , and when i see any object, my mind will analyze and put forward the correct reference i.e WORD OR SYMBOL in my mind.
    so here “WORD OR SYMBOL” forms a relation between ME and ACTUAL OBJECT or IMAGINARY THINGS PROJECTED BY MY MIND. so can we say this “WORD OR SYMBOL” are interference in between ME and REALITY … so is it possible to drop this interference??

    If i tried so hard to do it, if i don’t give any label to it…. how can mind will accumulate it?? So if it can’t accumulate , can we do anything on it?? can we provide Water and Bio-Fertilizer now . how we will know Nature,how can we understand or discover what “tree” actually is??
    So What “UNDERSTANDING” actually mean to the MIND??

    1. Hello Shekhar,

      Your question is really interesting. What mind uses to refer the words, symbols and codes? How does mind store it?

      I don’t know the answer of this question. When I was learning language in school, I had a beautiful book, full of pictures and colors. On first page, there was a picture and it was written “Apple” under that. Since that day, my mind uses this label “Apple” to that particular fruit. When I see that fruit or want to remember that fruit, I use this label.

      But before that, there was no label in my mind for that particular fruit. There was no mediator between me and that. But in the process of learning a language, my mind was conditioned by thousands of labels. Language is to deal with information and knowledge. It is a different world of “Words”.
      I will think about it more deeply to understand it. I request you share your views on this question.

      Your second question is about the response of mind.

      One must understand the conditioning of mind. Tree is a tree forever. It does not depend on our observation. Whether we put a label on it or not… it will be the same. And yes it is a barrier between one and reality. One must be in direct touch with the object to understand it completely. Words are conditioned and influenced and they cannot give us the freedom we need to observe.

      This barrier can be drop very easily. It the mind can understand that the word is just a symbol and it has no relation with the object. If the mind can understand that the word has no meaning in itself. It will automatically drop the word. It cannot be done forcefully. One cannot practice this thing… and even one should not. It is totally based on understanding. Don’t force yourself to do so. If you really want to know the difference, than try to understand the relation between “words” and “objects”.

      Reaction of mind is an experience accumulated by mind itself. Does it mean that mind is making its own experience and connecting them to symbols and words? When we see a new color, we ask “Which color is this?” and we store a label for that color. This reaction of mind to the new is an experience and mind wants to be with it. I really don’t understand this complication.

      There are so many books where one can find the answer for these questions. But all those questions are futile without the understanding. The more I go into this matter, the more I get confused. But it is really interesting.

      Keep in touch. I will share about it, when it will come to me.

      Thank you.

      1. yes Sir i appreciate u,Thanks for response. Thanks for your valuable time

        Reaction of mind is an experience accumulated by mind itself. it mean that mind is making
        its own experience and connecting them to symbols and words, yes you are right its very true.

        Here is something i need to say,it is bit difficult to explain but i had tried my best. it will be better if you understood it diagrammatically…

        you said:”at your childhood you were unknown of any language when you saw the apple it was stored into your mind without any Label, that means without any reference.”

        yes this is true,but there was some reference to that apple when you had stored it into your mind… i will give you an example , lets assume, today i went into your past in your childhood period. now you are unknown of any language except some English (just for our communication)
        but you are totally unknown of any fruit, you have not seen them yet or not hear it yet.. so i put an Apple in-front of you,and as you had said you will be store it into your mind
        without any label or reference. now i have put another fruit i.e Mango In-front of you,and in same way you have store it into your mind.
        now next day,Again i have put Apple infornt of
        you; and i ask “Have you seen it before?”… and your answer will be yes. so now i will put Mango infornt of you and ask you the same question and your answer will be same i.e yes…

        So my question is that why didn’t the experience of Mango overwrite the experience of Apple.
        why mind have not overwrite the Image of Mango on the Image of Apple. How you are able to distinguish between them?.
        So it means what?,Does mind is providing some respective unique Id to the Mango and Apple though which mind is Storing and Retrieving information via mind. So what this Unique id means to the Mind ?, are they not a reference to the information. In technical word this is called Indexing and Mapping technique.
        for example if we assume,that our Mind is maintains two Table namely Index Table and second is MapTable., IndexTable generally having one column(it may vary) i.e “Reference” (Alias as “R”) and MapTable have one column(it may also vary) i.e “Virtual Experience of Real world object(Projected by Mind)”(Alias as “VES”). mind is so Dynamic we cant say but IndexTable may be in fast accessing memory i.e primary memory and MapTable may be in secondary memory
        as it store a bulk of information. and this both table are linked to each other.
        Now As our mind is unknown of any language. So now,when i put an apple infornt of you ,eyes see it,your Mind will scan Its Memory(Primary) so fast and it will come to know that it is
        new object. so,if Mind want to store it, Mind will going to provide some reference to it.Now here in MapTable,column “VES” will be filled when,mind have some reaction(mentally or
        physically) on Apple, it will store the experience into secondary memory,but what about the first IndexTable column, “R”?,
        Now here will come two criteria:

        1)either Mind will keep this Column “R” as BLANK. Remember in English words, “BLANK” means “Nothing or Nil” but in Case of Mind it also has some value i.e it has meaning which means
        something to Mind(it may means that a waiting state,or answer/meaning for that actual object is yet to come). just as in Mathematics, number “0” ,it means nothing but it has value in Mathematics. So Mind will going to store Apple keeping its reference as Blank.

        2)Or it will keep this Column “R” as, “Apple Image” as it is. means an image of an Apple, has a Reference as an Apple,as it is.

        So,As every new thing is unknown to us,to store it,if every time i am using 1st criteria then every new object will be stored with Blank as reference,if it happen every time,one day our mind will collect a large information with blank as reference, but this blank reference is not a unique now because it is repeating for every unknown object.so after 25year when i see a Apple, my mind has to scan primary memory, but as it primary memory it will be so fast,answer comes quick and answer will put forward to me as Blank.but does it sense good.
        absolutely not. and what answer come “BLANK”! then we will go for second criteria.

        In second Criteria. my mind will give unique id to to every new object. i.e when i see an an Apple,my mind will used an Apple image to refer an Apple Experience. i.e Apple image is used
        to refer an apple itself. so next time whenever i will see an Apple,again my mind will scan primory memory,and put forward the answer as Apple Image.So what answer come to mind an “Apple Image”.

        so in Both case we get nothing but a BLANK and an Apple-image which are still unknown to us,my minds get the Apple Image as it is but,where does understanding comes to us???… If just an apple tree image is in my mind ,means it is in my thought world , so i can do anything with it in my thought world,i can let tree to fly in air… But in actual is it possible? may be can’t say. what all am trying to say is that,today what technology and Experiments we do on nature, without completely understanding the nature will only effect and destroy the nature.so By avoiding language/labels we can just replace/avoid the reference for storing and retrieving the information ,,.. but doing so can really we get actual understanding???

        i am totally unknown to you,you are totally unknown to me.. the only person which can totally understand me is “I” i.e myself and for you it is you yourself. now trees are unknown to us how can we understand them.. for that do we have to become as Tree, but after becoming tree do our conscious exist within,if it exist how will we express it??.

        my approach is towards a new way by which one can completely understand the Nature.

        According to me,Answer to my question.”What mind uses to refer the words, symbols and codes?” :
        As i said the Index Table has one column ,but i may change according to need of mind, because mind is dynamic.. here IndexTable has two column “Refernce1” and “Refrence2”., when mind is conditioned to any language mind use refernce1 to refer it to an object, in form of name which is nothing but “words, symbols and codes”, for example , now in IndexTable refence1 will store “Apple” word,and Reference2 will same as column “R” above explained ,i.e “Apple Image projected by mind”. so now When want recall first “Apple” words comes to mind the then the object , and when i see object , the mind will checked the IndexTable reference 2 column ,and accordingly its respective “Word or code” will comes to my mind…. So if we think, in reverse way, mind acts reversely here, that means mind uses “Apple Image which is projected by mind” to refer “Apple” Word of English Alphabet, so it is reaction of mind depending upon store and retrieve of the information….

        This is all what i can say, it seems to be some bookish,but it is all what i feel, its my

        personal opinion. Sir its an enquiry … i am really sorry if i made any mistake..

        Waiting for your Response…

        Thank You….

        1. Hello Shakher, how are you? I am really sorry for replying you so much late.

          Your question is really interesting. I liked the way how you put the functions of mind into a database management system. It may be true or maybe not. I can understand your question and explanation very deeply. But I really don’t know the answer or reality. I really don’t know how it all happens in our mind.
          Let me think about it in a different way.

          1. We talk about the experience and memory of seeing an apple or mango. Can we say that “Experience” is an end product of “experiencing”? If we are experiencing something and we are in that state…. There is no experience. When the “experiencing” will come to an end… the memory of it will be stored in mind as an “experience”. So, “experiencing” and “experience” are two different things.

          2. Experiencing can go on continues and it will not create any memory. At the end of experiencing it will create a memory in the mind as an “experience.” So we can say “experience” is a dead thing, it is an end product or final result.

          3. Our memory is made of these thousands of experiences. So we can say it is a final result or final conclusion of something. So it implies, memory is always old and rigid. It is not flexible. It is an end product so it cannot be changed or cannot make itself move.

          4. Memory is a dead thing not dynamic. So what can it do? Can it follow the swift movement of present? Absolutely not. A dead thing can never follow the dynamic. So it can only compare and measure with the present. Memory is old and present moment is now (ever new all the time). So memory cannot follow the present. It does comparison and measurement. That is all it can do.

          5. The “I” or “Self” is also a memory. It is a result of whole process.

          6. The reaction of memory is thought. So the thought is never free from the old.

          7. Understanding is not an end product or conclusion. It is go on process all the time. It has no memory of itself or does not have any conclusion. So it is always new. It is not like knowledge which can be stored in mind.

          8. Thought is connected to knowledge, but understanding is totally different thing. Thought and knowledge is always bound by something. They must have a reference. There is a thought “about” something. There is knowledge “about” something. Thought presents always in relation to something so it is always conditioned, bound and modified as you can see this. There is never an “abstract” thought.

          9. Thought is a conclusion. So it always demands more conclusions. It is interested in end or result. It wants to attain final goal. It wants to reach at the end as soon as possible. And in this hurry, it forgets about the process which is present and which is most significant.

          10. Understanding is a state where there is no desire for end or conclusion to add it to memory. It is not interested in results or final goals. It knows that the “present is dynamic”. It knows that “now is new” always. It knows that “truth is becoming”. So understanding goes on continuously.

          It is really simple to see but so much difficult to explain.

          Think it in more simplicity. Don’t try to reach any conclusion. An apple is different than mango. And through senses the mind can see the difference of these two and can store the experience of it in its memory. So it is not a big deal. Both can be a symbol whether it is a real apple or just a word for the information.

          Try to think upon the above 10 points and analyze your questions again. I hope you will find the point I want to show you. Your interest is in knowing that “how does understating come into being in a state of observation without symbols or codes”. But the point is not “symbols” or “codes”. It is about the freedom to see.

          It is not about the greed to collect knowledge or making more conclusions. All conclusions are self-enclosing.

          Let me explain it with a different example. I think I made it more complicated. Let me try to make it simple and loving.

          Person A says… “God exists”

          Person B says… “God does not exists”

          See, both statements of A and B are “Conclusions”. These “conclusions” are result of past and making the mind more “closed”. These persons are not able to see reality. This is knowledge.

          1. Reality is not a dead thing. It is dynamic.
          2. Knowledge is based on conclusion… so it is a dead thing.
          3. Knowledge can never follow the Reality.

          Nothing is certain…. And this is the ultimate knowledge that brings the freedom to think. See the truth of this… and it will bring understating.

          I don’t know. Did I make my point clear or not? I hope you will get the point.

          Blessings.

  4. what i say in words for your amazing and awakening articles, i’m silent and nothing to say, but afterall i said so much.

    your parietal lobe also bigger than ordinary one which is visualizing truth and sharing with all. you have a peerless identity.

    Love you dearest friend.
    Take Care.

  5. TO Survive,Mind and body, depends on each other. Body can’t live without mind
    and mind can’t live without body….but my question is that what we are sensing
    is it exactly what really it is…???

    for example,
    there is a tree in front of me.. if i measure its height with our standard measurement, it is 10 meter tall. now if i see this tree from 1 meter
    distance away,without any measurement, i can say, tree i taller than me…
    after this i went 1500 meter distance away from tree, now tree seems to appear
    shorter than me… if i continue to do so time will come when the tree will completely vanish off my eyes.

    Now,if i am totally uneducated person, i will conclude, tree becoming shorter
    as we go far away for it,and tree becoming taller when i comes near to it… so
    is it reality.??? because as size of tree is changing but not shape…
    So does our eyes see the truth?? … I don’t know…!!

    Now here is something, in this process, i want to say…
    There are Three things
    A) TREE which is Actual object,
    B)EYES as medium to see.
    c)Mind is an Observer.

    now to see the Reality,what TREE ACTUALLY is, MIND uses EYES as a medium…. now here in between OBJECT ie. TREE and OBSERVER i.e MIND there is MEDIATOR i.e EYEs. means there is not direct reception of Reality… now its depend on EYES
    whether it show the EXACT REALITY to the MIND or not.

    we will see it in following table.

    REALITY EYES MIND
    1)TREE IMAGE NOT-EXACT NOT-EXACT
    2)TREE IMAGE EXACT NOT-EXACT
    3)TREE IMAGE NOT-EXACT EXACT
    4)TREE IMAGE EXACT EXACT

    To see the Reality we will need LAST 4th ROW must happen.. then only we can
    see the can see THE REALITY…

    But first question arises, what we see (color ,shape,size,distance,dimension..etc)???, does MIND
    sees it OR EYE sees it???. This can be known if some COLORBLINDNESS eye person
    donate his eyes to some NORMAL EYE person… it is one of the way, but can’t tell
    exactly it will work or not.. !!!

    So it means, We NEED TO BE MORE OPEN MIND…

    _/_ NAMASTE

    You are really nice, Great person,… really word can’t explain your Goodness..
    you really show a way of Truth, you gives us freedom of thinking,you really
    make us free…
    Blessings…
    Take care,
    Thank you…
    🙂

    1. Reality is not static my dear. It is flowing all the time. Don’t use your fantasy to define it or bound it.

      I see tree from a distance and it looks smaller. (It must be look like so, otherwise what is the role of distance.)

      I see tree closely and it looks really big. (It must be look like so, because there is no distance.)

      It is important to understand that….

      “Everything in this world… is as…. as it should be. There is no other better option. It is perfectly what it is. Look at it.. with it totality and understand the beauty, power and integrity of it.”

      I am busy in some project work so we will discuss later on this topic. Ok dear.

  6. Sorry sir,Sorry for late reply…

    Sir you are really a very nice and Good heart person… i heartily respect
    you… i am getting what you want to say, but not completely understanding
    yet… i really like your clear and perfect explanation…its really hard to
    explain.. but you given me time from your busy schedule , i am really thankful
    for…..

    first thing, every things are neural in this universe, it depends on its use
    whether GOOD or BAD… some use their mind and knowledge for GOOD purpose and
    some for bad…. its not matter of greed and making final conclusion… if so, the topic must to be end here… nothing to speak.. nothing say….. just see and let it happen
    whats happening… but whats happening with nature, is it valid, a right justice????..

    Also Sir,i want to say, this is not a debate in which one of us will win and
    other lose, so please don’t misunderstand me … and please Sir its my humble
    request, forgive me if am making any mistake… its just an enqury…. i really
    don’t know the truth… but this is what i feel….

    1) what is COMPARISON? … it is means to compare between…
    Now what is COMPARE?? its finding difference between TWO OBJECTS/STATES..
    What is the need of comparison? generally for analysis, OVER ALL TO SAY TO
    FIND “DIFFERENCE OR CHANGE”…
    so its sure for comparison we need atleast two objects, because difference doesn’t exist if we compare an object/state with
    itself..

    “So IF THEIR EXIST A “CHANGE” MEANS THEIR MUST BE TWO OBJECT/STATE HAVING SOME DIFFERENCE’S.”

    BUT WHAT IS “CHANGE”?? IT MEANS SOME ACTION HAPPEN..

    AND HOW WILL WE KNOW CHANGE OCCURS???… WHEN “NOTHING/BLANK/NONACTIVE STATE” GOES TO “SOMETHING/ACTIVE STATE” OR “ONE ACTIVE STATE/SOMETHING” GOES TO “ANOTHER ACTIVE STATE/ANOTHER THING”….

    2)Sir,i deeply observe your all 10 points.all what you want to say is that,TO KNOW
    THE REALITY OF VERY PRESENT MOMENT, MIND NEED TO ELIMINATE OR IGNORE ITS MEMORY. LEAVING THE OLD MEMORY BEHIND MIND CAN CATCH THE VERY NEW PRESENT MOMENT…
    AM I RIGHT???

    3) Sir you have given a very good example about Experiencing and Experience…
    But What Actually the complete process of seeing is??…here we will take two
    example to explain this:

    Example A: Normal seeing:
    Sir suppose ,you had only a lawn in the garden of your house and it is
    visible from the window of your room., Everyday in morning you get up and see
    it, its noting special so because its everyday regular routine… Now Assume suppose,At night when you were sleeping, i came and i paint this lawn with white
    color. So in Morning, as usual when you get up ,you see out from your window,
    you get surprised!!!
    so why you get surprised?? Because Some CHANGE HAPPENS(THIS
    IS MOST IMPORTANT please NOTE IT “SOME CHANGE HAPPENS”)..
    this present day also your mind were expecting the same green color lawn as usual…

    now question is HOW this sudden “CHANGE” HAPPEN is understand by the mind???… So if we observe deeply in our mind,when every morning mind get up,look through the window,now the ACTUAL REALITY of lawn(green color) is exposed to your eyes,now minds take this information from his eyes compare it with the old memory of Lawn Experience(usually green)there was no difference,means what, The outer Reality(green color) and inner memory Lawn Experience(green color) is SAME.

    AS THIS TWO OBJECTS(ACTUAL OUTER REALITY RECEIVED THROUGH EYES AND MEMORY LAWN EXPERIENCE) ARE SIMILAR AND HAS NO DIFFERENCES, THEIR WILL BE NO “CHANGE”(According to my 1st point).. AND YOU WILL NOT SURPRISE…

    But when the lawn were colored with white color. mind will get this color through the eyes compare with the old memory of Lawn(usually green),here it will find difference in color,so According to my 1st point,IF THERE EXIST A “CHANGE” MEANS THERE EXIST TWO OBJECT/STATE. so mind will know something new happens it get surprised.

    Example B:According your way of seeing:
    In this what will we see, we will be only Experiencing i.e we will not store
    it into the memory or ignore it.`here also we will take the same example of green lawn… we will start from “ZERO” i.e form totally BLANK MEMORY OR NO MEMORY.

    So when the lawn was green,you look through the window,now again the ACTUAL REALITY of lawn(green color) is exposed to eyes.the green lawn light falls on your eyes,…..
    BUT HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT THE GREEN LIGHT HAD FALL ON YOUR EYES?? BECAUSE ONLY, AS PREVIOUSLY THERE WAS NO GREEN LIGHT IN-FRONT OF YOUR EYES,AND NOW THE GREEN LAWN
    LIGHT FALLS,YOU YOUR MIND OR EYES KNOW THE “CHANGE” HAPPEN.

    NOW NOTE HERE IS MOST IMPORTANT POINT, HOW DOES MIND OR EYES KNOW THIS “CHANGE” OCCURS??. HERE EYES IS ARE JUST A SENSOR OR WINDOW TO THE OUTER WORLD BUT WHO OPERATE THEM IS
    A MIND.
    SO HOW MIND KNOWS THAT THE GREEN LAWN LIGHT FALLS ON ITS EYES???…”ONLY WHEN MIND WAS KNOWING THAT UPTILL NOW THE GREEN LAWN LIGHT WAS NOT FALLING ON ITS EYES”.

    DOES IT NOT A STATE CHANGE IN OBSERVATION?? WHEN EYES WAS
    CLOSED,IT WAS DARK IN FRONT OF ITs EYES AND WHEN EYES OPEN IT WAS GREEN LAWN. ITS DEFINITELY A STATE CHANGE,….

    SO ACCORDING TO MY 1st POINT …THERE EXIST TWO OBJECT(DARK/BLANK AND ACTUAL OUTER REALITY ), BUT WHERE IT PHYSICALLY
    (CHEMICAL/SIGNAL FORM) EXIST NOW ??? WHERE??? YES IN OUR MIND ITSELF,…

    MEANS WHAT,IN THE VERY PRESENT MOMENT YOUR MIND IS
    HOLDING(temporarily) OR STORING(permanently) ONE OBJECT(i.e DARK/BLANK/NO-STATE/ZERO) PREVIOUSLY AND THEN OTHER OBJECT(REALITY) COMES NOW.

    SO DOES IT MEANS,”YOU CAN’T SEE “NEW” UNLESS YOU
    COMPARE IT WITH “OLD”. THEIR IS A TERM “OLD” MEANS WHAT,IN YOUR TOLD WAY OF SEEING/LOOKING ALSO “MIND WILL NEED MEMORY” TOO.

    3) Sir,when you say the Term “NEW”??? first there must exist a Term “OLD”…
    Means What, “NEW ONLY EXIST WITH RESPECT TO OLD AND OLD TERM ONLY EXIST WITH RESPECT TO NEW”….
    For example, when i can say i have a bike or new bike ?? only when
    i will have “NO BIKE/BLANK/NOTHING” OR HAVING “PREVIOUS BIKE”… we can only say “NEW” with respect to “OLD”. and old may be ZERO/BLANK/DARK/NOTHING. whatever it may be but without comparing old,its not even possible to just touch the NEW.

    4) Sir,you have told in your point 4th that “present moment is now (ever new all the
    time), Its fresh all the time.” And in YOUR 10th point “Understanding knows
    that “now is new” always”, …….
    THEN IF YOU WILL NOT COMPARE IT WITH PREVIOUSLY VERY PRESENT OLD MOMENT HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT THERE IS NEW RESENT MOMENT ALL THE TIME????. SO IF THERE EXIST A NEW PRESENT MOMENT… MEANS WHAT THERE IS SOME COMPARISON,… MEANS WHAT,IN YOUR TOLD CASE ALSO MEMORY EXIST. SO HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT UNDERSTANDING IS NOT HAVING MEMORY???

    5) If i observe your way of thinking it seem similar to the state what we called
    “ABSENT MIND”… In this ABSENT MIND STATE we are NOT AWARE of what we are looking or doing, so definitely NO MEMORY WILL BE CREATED.. many times we say,i forget where i kept my keys,pen,files… etc just now it was with me. so its
    ABSENT MIND SATE.
    for example,…
    if at home,i had big quarrel with my family…and i was late to office meeting and aggressively i went to office. now it was office meeting, but still my mind was hanging with the quarrel ….it was new project discussion… the project were explained and all members by-turn were conveying their views and reviews but when members ask my views, what happen ,suddenly my presence mind came back in office, I try hard to recall, but hardly i could say anything… why ??? because my mind was not present there. so even though my body was there,my eyes was open , my ear was open , i was not aware, BECAUSE OF THIS NO MEMORY WAS CREATING… so there was no information in my mind about the new project, even though i try hard to recall, i was helpless… because there was no memory…..

    Thank you…
    waiting for your response…..

    take care… keep smiling…

    _/_ Namaste Sir…

    1. Dear Shekhar, I am really sorry for not replying you. Actually I am busy in a project work and not getting enough time to do anything else. We will discuss on these topics later.

      I think the basic problem is with the word “New”. “New” can be of two types. One type is “a continuity of old” in a “modified” way. Like a bike… 60cc bike was invented first.. and we have a 1200cc bike in present. But this bike is same as old bike. Present bike is a modified (improved) version of the old one; but it is not new. It is just a continuity of old. It has its roots in old… so we can easily compare it to its old version.

      The second “New” is not a continuation of old. It is a total destruction of old. It has no roots in the past. It has no influence of the past. Creation takes place on the destruction of the old. Not a partial destruction… but complete. It is not a thing to compare because it has no continuity.

      Meditate on these word and find out the actual difference between the two “New”. I know you will find it. Blessings my dear. We will talk more on this topic later. Ok

  7. hello Dear Sir , How are you…

    Really very Sorry for disturbing , you are busy in your project ,am really very sorry, please take your own time to reply me..
    i am really sorry ,Actually my English is too weak,thats why its difficult to you for getting what i actully want to ask..
    please its my humble request,once read my last message again and please try to understand it…

    i think, i had made it complicated ,… Ok Sir i will try ask in simple way….

    Q1)How will I KNOW THAT I AM IN CONTINUOUS PRESENT MOMENT…?? how will I KNOW that AT THE VERY PRESENT MOMENT, THIS IS ONLY THE VERY PRESENT MOMENT ???

    i want to say , either we take first NEW or Second NEW,it won’t matters…

    In first NEW. we came to know, this is a NEW version only by comparing with the old version…
    And in second NEW,as you said “It is a total destruction of old.”; means what?? now we will come into a Total Blank state..
    Now How will WE KNOW this NEW is a Totally New Creation ??only when we will compare it with the our Blank state..

    Q2)How The Nature will communicate with us ?? in what way…??

    As generally we can know Nature in two ways,
    1) By use of Technology(scientific methods)
    2)Nature by its own tell us,what they actually are….

    But in first case, Doing experiments on Nature is according to our knowledge about it… hence without Total understanding of Nature,Doing Experiments on it,will surely leads to destruction of Nature…

    So whats the another way….

    I hope you will get me now… Please take your own time to reply…

    Thank you…
    take care…
    Blessings…

    __/_Namaste…

  8. SIR PLEASE NOTE THIS MESSAGE,IT IS COMPLETE….

    hello Dear Sir , How are you…

    Really very Sorry for disturbing , you are busy in your project ,am really very sorry, please take your own time to reply me..
    i am really sorry ,Actually my English is too weak,thats why its difficult to you for getting what i actually want to ask..
    please its my humble request,once read my last message again and please try to understand it…

    i think, i had made it complicated ,… Ok Sir i will try ask in simple way….

    Q1)How will I KNOW THAT I AM IN CONTINUOUS PRESENT MOMENT…?? how will I KNOW that AT THE VERY PRESENT MOMENT, THIS IS ONLY THE VERY PRESENT MOMENT ???

    i want to say , either we take first NEW or Second NEW,it won’t matters…

    In first NEW. we came to know, this is a NEW version only by comparing with the old version/OLD MEMORIES…
    And in second NEW,as you said “It is a total destruction of old.”; means what?? now we will come into a Total Blank state/BLANK MEMORIES..
    Now How will WE KNOW this NEW is a Totally New Creation ??only when we will compare it with the our Blank state/BLANK MEMORIES..

    Means what, in both case we HOLD MEMORIES.. i.e
    1)old version memories
    2)Blank memories
    Holding this memories and comparing it with the NEW….,MIND WILL CAME TO KNOW,THAT SOME CHANGE HAPPENS AND THERE IS SOMETHING NEW IN FRONT OF IT..

    Q2)Then How can we say Memories should be eliminate to know NEW (present)???

    Q3)How The Nature will communicate with us ?? in what way…??

    As generally we can know Nature in two ways,
    1) By use of Technology(scientific methods)
    2)Nature by its own tell us,what they actually are….

    But in first case, Doing experiments on Nature is according to our knowledge about it… hence without Total understanding of Nature,Doing Experiments on it,will surely leads to destruction of Nature…

    So whats the another way….

    I hope you will get me now… Please take your own time to reply…

    Thank you…
    take care…
    Blessings…

    __/_Namaste…

  9. Hello dear sir ……
    how are you…

    last time we postponed the discussion on working of mind……

    You have wrote in your article of Mind and Measurement :
    http://www.dhavaria.com/2012/12/22/mind-measurement/
    what I need to say you had justified it in this article….

    Yes Mind always compares …. Mind compare to know the present, new, best, updates etc…. but to compare, every-time it need two objects ,its sure…. Here I want to say mind is comparing between two memories….. in between past and present…..
    so past memories may be blank… But without comparison with past memories how could we say/know that we are in present moment… ???… how will we know that we have visualize ,listen ,taste or sense anything….??

    Love and blessing….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *